Showing 411 - 420 of 564 Items

Democracy Promotion in U.S. Counterinsurgency: Tracing Post-War Security Sector Reconstruction in El Salvador and Iraq

Date: 2020-01-01

Creator: Emma Redington Lawry

Access: Open access

Throughout the 21st century, certain facets of the democratic peace theory have informed American foreign policy, as policymakers credit democracy promotion with long-term stability and peace. In contrast, many political scientists have documented the often destabilizing and violent effects of democratization, particularly in underdeveloped states. How can we reconcile these tensions, and in what ways do they affect American foreign policy abroad? Under the lens of just war theory, or the doctrine of military ethics detailing the conditions under which it is morally acceptable to go to war, wage war and restore peace after war, this paper seeks to examine security sector reconstruction in post-counterinsurgency eras. In doing so, my analysis documents the effects of electoral processes on security and underscores the many difficulties of post-war rebuilding processes. In understanding these difficulties, I attempt to extract crucial lessons from the “best case” scenario of El Salvador and the “worst case” scenario of Iraq, both of which illuminate the fundamental tension between democratization and stability.


Miniature of Examination of tooth-specific <i>cis</i>-regulation of the <i>dlx2b</i> gene during zebrafish development
Examination of tooth-specific cis-regulation of the dlx2b gene during zebrafish development
This record is embargoed.
    • Embargo End Date: 2025-05-14

    Date: 2020-01-01

    Creator: Yujin Moon

    Access: Embargoed



      Miniature of Metabolic Inhibitors Induce Species-Specific Defects in Bacterial Glycosylation
      Metabolic Inhibitors Induce Species-Specific Defects in Bacterial Glycosylation
      Access to this record is restricted to members of the Bowdoin community. Log in here to view.

          Date: 2020-01-01

          Creator: Ilana R. Olin

          Access: Access restricted to the Bowdoin Community



            Chambers of Reflection: Rousseau, Tocqueville, and Self-Government in the Digital Age

            Date: 2020-01-01

            Creator: John Sweeney

            Access: Open access

            Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Alexis de Tocqueville each warn that the dominant cultures of their days may hinder the project of self-government. Against the backdrop of advancing Enlightenment philosophy, Rousseau writes that as social visibility increases relative to intimate connection, the drive for recognition corrupts self-love. Following the American and French revolutions, Tocqueville explores the democratic erosion of social hierarchies. He writes that a rise in individualism may obscure “self-interest well-understood”—the perspective gained through collaboration with others, thoughtful reflection, and reverence for truths that lie beyond the dictates of cursory instincts. In this project, I apply these political theories to the Digital Age. I explain how the distinction between the physical world and the digital realm has actualized Rousseau’s depiction of double men, “always appearing to relate everything to others and never relating anything except to themselves alone.” In the era of social distancing, technological evolution threatens to induce regression in the sociability and reflective agency that promote our capacity for self-government. Accordingly, I argue that Rousseau’s theory of corrupted drive for recognition and Tocqueville’s theory of individualism inform a new danger to political freedom: digital tribalism.


            Miniature of From Shadow to Spotlight:  Minoritarian Characters, Representative Failures,  and High School Powerarchy in Teen Television
            From Shadow to Spotlight: Minoritarian Characters, Representative Failures, and High School Powerarchy in Teen Television
            This record is embargoed.
              • Embargo End Date: 2028-05-18

              Date: 2023-01-01

              Creator: Paloma Ada Aguirre

              Access: Embargoed



                Fact vs. Faction: Polarization in the Information Age

                Date: 2016-05-01

                Creator: Noah Finberg

                Access: Open access

                How can individuals in the contemporary media and political environment form better political beliefs? In chapter one, this thesis considers what it means to say American politics is polarized. It evaluates the extent of polarization in American politics. And it presents original evidence that suggests that just as the public and members of Congress have polarized, so too has American political discourse. Through the lens of political psychology, chapter two investigates how America’s polarized politics has influenced the quality of individuals’ beliefs. Chapter three explores the role that the media plays in encouraging or minimizing the biased information processing practices identified in chapter two. Finally, I conclude by arguing that individuals need to fundamentally rethink how they consume political information; advocate for the creation of a completely new social media platform specifically designed to encourage political deliberation; and outline what such a platform might look like.


                When is Change Possible? Presidential Power as Shaped by Political Context, Constitutional Tools, and Legislative Skills

                Date: 2021-01-01

                Creator: Ryan Telingator

                Access: Open access

                Many Americans believe that the president is an omnipotent figure who can achieve any political or policy objective if they try hard enough. On the contrary, the presidency was intentionally crafted by the Framers of the Constitution to have limited legislative powers to mitigate the risk of despotism. Thus, this paper seeks to answer the question, when is change possible?, to try to bridge the gap between popular belief and Constitutional powers. Three questions guide this research: 1) What conditions are conducive for change? 2) What Constitutional tools help a president facilitate change? And 3) What skills can a president bring to office to help create change? This thesis seeks to answer these questions by reviewing the existing literature on political context, tools, and legislative skills. Case study analyses of the Lyndon Johnson and Ronald Reagan presidencies are then presented to assess their legislative successes and failures, and the factors behind them. Finally, the thesis concludes by evaluating President Joseph Biden’s first 100 days in office and uses the theory and findings from the cases to predict Biden’s ability to affect change. This research reveals that the political context is the most important factor in determining the possibility of change – successful change relies on open policy windows, resilient ideological commitments, and a mandate to stimulate congressional action. Within the constraints of the case studies, Constitutional tools were not important. Legislative skills helped to pass legislation, however, they were not potent enough to overcome a bad political context.


                Visions of Unity, Memories of Violence: American Civil Religion and the Japanese American Incarceration

                Date: 2018-05-01

                Creator: Brigitte Helene McFarland

                Access: Open access



                Miniature of The Politics of Seeing: John Ruskin As Political Thinker
                The Politics of Seeing: John Ruskin As Political Thinker
                This record is embargoed.
                  • Embargo End Date: 2027-05-16

                  Date: 2024-01-01

                  Creator: Hayden D. Redelman

                  Access: Embargoed



                    Modeling the Development & Expression of Political Opinion: A Zallerian Approach

                    Date: 2024-01-01

                    Creator: Avery C Ellis

                    Access: Open access

                    Research focused on John Zaller's famous RAS model of political opinion formation and change from "The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion" (1992). Analyzed the mathematical and psychological underpinnings of the model, the first paper to do so in over fifteen years and the first to do so through an analysis of motivated reasoning and Bayesian reasoning. Synthesized existing critiques of Zaller's model and other literature to suggest ways to build on Zaller, utilizing fundamental reunderstandings of opinions and messages from political and mathematical perspectives. Found verification for Zaller's model, confirming its value, but also found support for the proposed RAIS model, which suggests foundational changes in the way citizens interact with information in the current political environment. Confirmed the utility of a Zallerian framework for analyzing shifts in mass opinion over time and suggested ways to improve the creation of surveys and polls for understanding elections and reported opinions on issues.